Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and particulate matter (PM) are major constituents of smog. Delhi experiences severe smog during post-monsoon season, but a quantitative understanding of VOCs and PM sources is still lacking. Here, we source-apportioned VOCs and PM, using a high-quality recent (2022) dataset of 111 VOCs, PM2.5, and PM10 using positive matrix factorization. Contrasts between clean-monsoon and polluted-post-monsoon air, VOC source fingerprints, molecular-tracers, enabled differentiating paddy-residue burning from other biomass-burning sources, which has hitherto been impossible. Fresh paddy-residue burning and residential heating & waste-burning contributed the highest to observed PM10 (25 % & 23 %), PM2.5 (23 % & 24 %), followed by heavy-duty CNG-vehicles 15 % PM10 and 11 % PM2.5. For ambient VOCs, ozone, and SOA formation potentials, top sources were petrol-4-wheelers (20 %, 25 %, 30 %), petrol-2-wheelers (14 %, 12 %, 20 %), mixed-industrial emissions (12 %, 14 %, 15 %), solid fuel-based cooking (10 %, 10 %, 8 %) and road construction (8 %, 6 %, 9 %). Emission inventories tended to overestimate residential-biofuel emission (>2) relative to the PMF output. The major source of PM pollution was regional biomass burning, whereas traffic and industries governed VOC and secondary pollutant formation. Our novel source-apportionment method quantitatively resolved even similar biomass and fossil-fuel sources, offering insights into both VOC and PM sources affecting extreme-pollution events. It represents a notable advancement over current source apportionment approaches, and would be of great relevance for future studies in other polluted cities/regions of the world with complex source mixtures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Awasthi et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: