⌘+K

Pulse Explore Clubs Researchers Journals

Home Clubs Explore

February 23, 2024The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants

Comparing Bone Alteration and Esthetic Recovery Between the Socket-Shield Technique and the Conventional Immediate Implant Technique: A Retrospective Study

Xingfu Li Nanxin Liu Xinhan Li Gang Fu Hong Huang

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Abstract

To evaluate bone preservation and esthetic recovery between the socket-shield technique (SST) with different labial bone plate thicknesses and the conventional immediate implant technique (CIIT).

Discussion

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Cite This Study

Li et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e77e09b6db6435876f24d7 https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.10833

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Keep reading

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

1Comparing the modified socket‐shield technique with the conventional immediate implantation technique in the anterior dentition: A 5‐year retrospective clinical study2024 · 10 citations
2EVALUATION OF IMMEDIATE LOADED IMPLANTS PLACED USING THE SOCKET SHIELD TECHNIQUE IN THE ESTHETIC ZONE (A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL)2024
3Comparative effectiveness of the socket shield technique versus conventional implantation approaches in the esthetic zone: A systematic review and network meta-analysis2025
4Comparison of Three-Dimensional Bone Changes in Socket Shield Technique Versus Immediate Implant Placement – A Non-Randomized Clinical Trial2024
5Preserving Peri-Implant Soft Tissue Health: A Case Report on Immediate Implant Placement Using the Socket Shield Technique2024