Bibliometric analysis reveals evolving roles of crowdsourcing in green finance, highlighting significant gaps and future areas of research.
Abstract This research applies bibliometric analysis to investigate the evolving function of crowdsourcing in green finance. Explore 1456 peer-reviewed articles (2014–2024); using the biblioshiny package from the R environment, the study pinpoints trends in articles, key contributors in the specific period, thematic maps, and globally recognised journals. Clusters point out four significant areas of study: equity and entrepreneurial crowdfunding for sustainable entrepreneurship, sustainable development through crowdfunding, entrepreneurship from crowdfunding ecosystems, and integration of renewable energy and reward-based crowdfunding. Findings underscore the emerging nature of green crowdfunding in different dimensions and with the integration of multiple areas of study. However, a significant gap exists, particularly in in-depth longitudinal studies in each separate area and region-based effects in policy and its implications in the green crowdfunding platform. The study provides areas such as technological innovation, investor behaviour, CSR, and eco-focused marketing that can be infused with green financing as an innovative space.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Saranya et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: