This case study examines air pollution dynamics using social media data, indicating shifts in community perception during COVID-19.
Air pollution has become a significant concern for human health, especially in developing countries. Among Primary Pollutants, particulate matter 2.5 (PM2.5), refers to airborne particles which have a diameter of 2.5 micrometres or less, and has become a widely used measure for monitoring air quality globally. The standard go-to method usually uses Federal Reference Grade sensors to understand air quality. But, they are quite cost-prohibitive, so the popular alternative is low-cost (LC) air quality sensors. Even LC air quality monitors do not cover many areas, especially across the global south. On the other hand, the ubiquitous use of online social media OSM has led to its evolution in participatory sensing. While it does not function as a physical sensor, it can be a proxy indicator of public perception on the topic under study. OSM platforms such as Twitter/X and Reddit have already demonstrated their value in understanding human perception across various domains, including air quality monitoring. This study focuses on understanding air pollution in a resource-constrained setting by examining how the community perception on social media can complement traditional monitoring. We leverage metadata readily available from social media user data to find patterns with air quality fluctuations before and during the pandemic. We use the US Embassy PM2.5 data for baseline measurement. In the study, we empirically analyse the variations in quantitative & intent-based community perception in seasonal & pandemic outbreaks with varying air quality. We compare the baseline against temporal & user-specific attributes of Twitter/X relating to tweets like daily frequency of tweets, tweet lags 1–5, user followers, user verified, and user lists memberships across two timelines: pre-COVID-19 (20 March 2019– 29 February 2020) & COVID-19 (1 March 2020–20 September 2020). Our analysis examines both the quantitative and the intent-based community engagement, highlighting the significance of features like user authenticity, tweet recurrence rates, and intensity of participation. Furthermore, we show how behavioural patterns in the online discussions diverged across the two periods, which reflected the broader shifts in the air pollution levels and the public attention. This study empirically demonstrates the significance of X/Twitter metadata, beyond standard tweet content, and provides additional features for modelling and understanding air quality in developing countries.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pramanik et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: