Key result
Electrical stimulation on carbon nanotube scaffolds accelerates iPSC-CM automaticity and upregulates electrophysiology-related genes.
A combined electrical stimulation and conductive carbon nanotube scaffold platform enhances the electrophysiological maturation of iPSC-CMs.
Introduction: Induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes (iPSC-CMs) theoretically offer infinite autologous cells for cardiac tissue engineering, but in reality are immature and thus unsuitable for use. Electrical stimulation and, to a lesser extent, conductive scaffolds, have been shown to promote electrophysiological function in cardiac cultures. We hypothesize that synergistic application of electrical stimulation and conductive scaffolds to iPSC-CMs will electrophysiologically mature them. Approach: We designed a novel bioreactor (Fig. 1A-C) consisting of a custom plate cover with carbon electrodes and modular elements controlled by a printed circuit board. We used our bioreactor to apply electrical stimulation (0.1, 1, and 10 V; 5 ms period; 20% duty cycle) to iPSC-CMs on conductive carbon nanotube (CNT) scaffolds and used RT-qPCR to analyze their response. Results: Electrical stimulation of iPSC-CMs resulted in primarily upregulation of electrophysiology-related genes when compared to non-stimulated iPSC-CMs (Fig. 1D). Additionally, stimulation with 0.1 and 1 V resulted in earlier automaticity as observed by spontaneous beating. Furthermore, electrical stimulation of iPSC-CMs seeded on CNT scaffolds (with and without laminin coating) revealed that direct contact with CNT scaffolds predominantly upregulated cardiac genes (Fig. 1E), whereas iPSC-CMs whose direct contact with CNT scaffolds was interrupted by laminin coating experienced predominantly downregulation of cardiac genes (Fig. 1F). This suggests that CNT scaffolds provide a superior microenvironment than commonly-used laminin for the development of iPSC-CM structure and function. Conclusions: Our combined stimulation-conduction platform constitutes a novel method for developing iPSC-CM electrophysiology, which has the potential to play a role in making iPSC-CMs more relevant for both diagnostic and therapeutic applications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cook et al. (2025) studied this question. Electrical stimulation and conductive carbon nanotube (CNT) scaffolds vs. non-stimulated iPSC-CMs was evaluated on Electrophysiology-related gene expression and automaticity. Electrical stimulation of iPSC-CMs on conductive carbon nanotube scaffolds upregulated electrophysiology-related genes and promoted earlier automaticity compared to non-stimulated cells.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: