This study found that in static states, the device can accurately transmit signal data with an error rate below 0.5%, packet loss rate of 2% and signal-to-noise ratio reaching 24dB. However, its performance declines slightly during motion states, with increased error rate (1.2%), packet loss rate (3%) and decreased signal-to-noise ratio (22dB). The error rate remains around 0.8% for different heart rate ranges. Moreover, signal loss or damage leads to a significant increase in error rate (5%) and packet loss rate (10%). Latency tests also demonstrate the device's ability to provide timely health monitoring data with average latency of 10-15ms. These results indicate the device's high precision and reliability in interference-free conditions, while further improvements in dynamic environments are needed. The comprehensive evaluation helps understand the strengths and limitations of such devices.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jiayang Hu (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: