Why the study?
Wearable technology for vital sign monitoring faces a tradeoff between accuracy and comfort caused by the elastic textile used.
Does the iSmartweaR wearable sensor accurately measure heart rate and breathing rate compared to gold standard methods in healthy participants and patients with cardiovascular disease?
Population
30 male and 23 female participants, including 23 patients with cardiovascular diseases and 30 healthy participants
Comparison
iSmartweaR wearable sensor vs gold standard method (CardioSoft and MasterScreen CPX)
Design
Validation study
Authors
Loading...
Requires further validation before clinical use; leaves open accuracy across postures, sex, and real-world settings.
Does the iSmartweaR wearable sensor accurately measure heart rate and breathing rate compared to gold standard methods in healthy participants and patients with cardiovascular disease?
The iSmartweaR wearable sensor provides accurate, real-time, and continuous monitoring of heart rate and breathing rate across different sexes and static postures.
Chen et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: