Abstract Background: Mental health research in post-conflict societies has predominantly concentrated on war-related traumas and post-traumatic stress disorder among those who lived through the conflict. However, there remains a significant gap in understanding the prevalence and severity of depression, anxiety disorders, sleeping disturbances among the younger generation in post-civil war societies, as well as their associations with age, gender, and risk and protective factors. This study aims to bridge this gap by focusing on young people in Mozambique, a resource-poor nation, two decades after the cessation of the civil war. Methods: The study used mixed methods comprising qualitative and quantitative instruments that included the Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II), Self-Report Questionnaire (SRQ) and Nocturnal Intrusions after Traumatic Experiences Questionnaire (NITE). The sample involved n = 794 young people in homesteads and schools. To examine the results, univariate analysis, chi-square tests, binary logistic regression analyses and odds ratio were used. Results: Risk factors were pervasive in households, communities, and schools. Mental health problems were commonly linked to severe depression (14.2%), anxiety-related disorders (39.3%), sleep disturbances (37.3%), and anxiety dreams (27.5%). Gender, age, and protective factors were associated with the incidence and severity of mental health outcomes, while living with both parents protected against the severity of anxiety-related disorders. Conclusions: Understanding the contextual mental health needs of young people in post-civil war Mozambique is crucial for developing insights to craft and implement targeted public mental health policies and interventions in resource-limited settings. Addressing mental health issues among young people necessitates a concentrated effort on understanding and managing the interplay of risks and protective factors within families, communities, and schools.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Igreja et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: