Spectroscopic analysis reveals s-process element enrichment in unevolved dwarf stars, indicating past mass transfer from asymptotic giant branch companions.
A classical Local Thermodynamic Equilibrium analysis, based on high-resolution spectroscopic data, is performed for a sample of three potential barium dwarf candidates and one star already recognized as such. We derived their atmospheric parameters, estimated their masses and luminosities, and determined chemical abundances for a set of 21 elements, including CNO. Some elemental abundances are derived for the first time in HD~15096, HD~37792, and HD~141804. The program stars are dwarfs/subgiants with metallicities typical of disc stars, exhibiting moderate carbon enhancements, with [C/Fe] ratios ranging from $+0.29$ to $+0.66$ dex, and high levels of slow neutron-capture (s-process) elements, with [s/Fe] +1.0~dex. As spectroscopic binaries, their peculiarities are attributable to mass transfer events. The observed neutron-capture patterns of were individually compared with two sets of s-process nucleosynthesis models (Monash and { fruity}), yielding dilution factors and masses estimates for the former polluting Asymptotic Giant Branch stars. Low-mass (3.0~M_) models successfully reproduce the observations. In addition, we estimated mean neutron exposures of the order of 0.6 -- 0.7 mb⁻¹ for the s-processed material observed in their envelopes. Applying an empirical initial-final mass relation, we constraint in ~ 0.7\,M_ the mass of their dim white-dwarf companions. Moreover, our kinematic study revealed that the program stars are members of the thin disk, with probabilities greater than 70%. Hence, we identified HD~15096 and HD~37792 as new barium dwarfs and confirmed that HD~141804 is a barium dwarf. Thus, the number of barium dwarfs identified in the literature from high-resolution spectroscopy increases to 71 objects.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Roriz et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: