A bstract Consider two boundary subregions A and B that lie in a common boundary Cauchy surface, and consider also the associated HRT surface γ B for B . In that context, the constrained HRT surface γ A : B can be defined as the codimension-2 bulk surface anchored to A that is obtained by a maximin construction restricted to Cauchy slices containing γ B . As a result, γ A : B is the union of two pieces, γA:BB γ A : B B and γA:BB̄ γ A : B B ¯ lying respectively in the entanglement wedges of B and its complement B̄ B ¯ . Unlike the area A(γA) A γ A of the HRT surface γ A , at least in the semiclassical limit, the area A(γA:B) A γ A : B of γ A : B commutes with the area A(γB) A γ B of γ B . To study the entropic interpretation of A(γA:B) A γ A : B , we analyze the Rényi entropies of subregion A in a fixed-area state of subregion B . We use the gravitational path integral to show that the n ≈ 1 Rényi entropies are then computed by minimizing A(γA) A γ A over spacetimes defined by a boost angle conjugate to A(γB) A γ B . In the case where the pieces γA:BB γ A : B B and γA:BB̄ γ A : B B ¯ intersect at a constant boost angle, a geometric argument shows that the n ≈ 1 Rényi entropy is then given by A(γA:B)4G A γ A : B 4 G . We discuss how the n ≈ 1 Rényi entropy differs from the von Neumann entropy due to a lack of commutativity of the n → 1 and G → 0 limits. We also discuss how the behaviour changes as a function of the width of the fixed-area state. Our results are relevant to some of the issues associated with attempts to use standard random tensor networks to describe time dependent geometries.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dong et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: