This research endeavours to delve into the intricacies of the Neo-Sufi paradigm by thoroughly examining the theoretical insights and concepts put forth by the eminent scholar Dr. Fazlur Rahman. As a prominent figure in Islamic studies, Dr. Rahman's contributions to understanding Sufism, particularly within the modern context, have been profound. This study aims to unravel the layers of the Neo-Sufi paradigm, a term coined by Dr. Rahman, by scrutinising his vital theoretical frameworks, philosophical underpinnings, and methodological approaches. The research methodology involves an interdisciplinary analysis that combines Islamic philosophy, theology, and mystical traditions. By drawing on primary sources, including Dr. Rahman's seminal work, the study aims to elucidate the evolution of Sufism and its adaptation to contemporary challenges. The investigation explores how Dr. Rahman's Neo-Sufi paradigm negotiates the traditional and the modern, addressing issues such as spirituality, ethics, and the role of Sufism in fostering social cohesion. Furthermore, the research critically evaluates Dr. Rahman's perspectives on the compatibility of Sufi thought with modern philosophical currents, shedding light on his attempts to reconcile tradition with the demands of the present era. The analysis also considers the implications of the Neo-Sufi paradigm on interfaith dialogue, pluralism, and the broader discourse on Islam in the contemporary world. In conclusion, this research contributes to a nuanced understanding of Sufism's relevance in the modern context by unravelling the Neo-Sufi paradigm and comprehensively examining Dr. Fazlur Rahman's theoretical insights and concepts. The findings of this study not only enrich academic discussions on Islamic thought but also offer valuable insights for policymakers, religious leaders, and scholars seeking to navigate the complex intersection of tradition and modernity within the Islamic framework.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mir et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: