Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Identifies an atypical RyR2 missense variant co-segregating with familial type 2 diabetes, indicating that receptor mutations can drive metabolic defects without severe cardiac disease.
Genome-wide association studies have identified several hundred loci associated with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Additionally, pathogenic variants in several genes are known to cause monogenic diabetes that overlaps clinically with T2DM. Whole-exome sequencing of related individuals with T2DM is a powerful approach to identify novel high-penetrance disease variants in coding regions of the genome. We performed whole-exome sequencing on four related individuals with T2DM – including one individual diagnosed at the age of 33 years. The individuals were negative for mutations in monogenic diabetes genes, had a strong family history of T2DM, and presented with several characteristics of metabolic syndrome. A missense variant (p.N2291D) in the type 2 ryanodine receptor ( RyR2) gene was one of eight rare coding variants shared by all individuals. The variant was absent in large population databases and affects a highly conserved amino acid located in a mutational hotspot for pathogenic variants in Catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (CPVT). Electrocardiogram data did not reveal any cardiac abnormalities except a lower-than-normal resting heart rate (< 60 bpm) in two individuals – a phenotype observed in CPVT individuals with RyR2 mutations. RyR2-mediated Ca 2+ release contributes to glucose-mediated insulin secretion and pathogenic RyR2 mutations cause glucose intolerance in humans and mice. Analysis of glucose tolerance testing data revealed that missense mutations in a CPVT mutation hotspot region – overlapping the p.N2291D variant – are associated with complete penetrance for glucose intolerance. In conclusion, we have identified an atypical missense variant in the RyR2 gene that co-segregates with diabetes in the absence of overt CPVT.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bansal et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: