Ultrasensitive cryogenic calorimeters have become a favored technology with widespread application where eV-scale energy resolutions are needed. In this article, we characterize the performance of an x-ray magnetic microcalorimeter (MMC) using a <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><a:mrow><a:mmultiscripts><a:mrow><a:mi>Fe</a:mi></a:mrow><a:mprescripts/><a:none/><a:mrow><a:mn>55</a:mn></a:mrow></a:mmultiscripts></a:mrow></a:math> source. Employing an optimum filter-based amplitude estimation and energy reconstruction, we demonstrate that a full-width half-maximum (FWHM) resolution of <c:math xmlns:c="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><c:mrow><c:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</c:mi><c:msub><c:mrow><c:mi>E</c:mi></c:mrow><c:mrow><c:mi>FWHM</c:mi></c:mrow></c:msub><c:mo>=</c:mo><c:mo stretchy="false">(</c:mo><c:mn>1.25</c:mn><c:mo>±</c:mo><c:mn>0.17</c:mn><c:mo stretchy="false">(</c:mo><c:mi>stat</c:mi><c:msubsup><c:mrow><c:mo stretchy="false">)</c:mo></c:mrow><c:mrow><c:mo>−</c:mo><c:mn>0.07</c:mn></c:mrow><c:mrow><c:mo>+</c:mo><c:mn>0.05</c:mn></c:mrow></c:msubsup><c:mo stretchy="false">(</c:mo><c:mi>syst</c:mi><c:mo stretchy="false">)</c:mo><c:mo stretchy="false">)</c:mo><c:mtext> </c:mtext><c:mtext> </c:mtext><c:mi>eV</c:mi></c:mrow></c:math> can be achieved, leading to an unprecedented energy resolving power <l:math xmlns:l="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><l:mi>E</l:mi><l:mo>/</l:mo><l:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</l:mi><l:msub><l:mi>E</l:mi><l:mrow><l:mi>FWHM</l:mi></l:mrow></l:msub><l:mo>∼</l:mo><l:mn>4700</l:mn></l:math> among existing energy-dispersive detectors for soft and tender x-rays. We also derive the best possible resolution and discuss limiting factors affecting the measurement. The analysis pipeline for the MMC data developed in this paper is furthermore an important step for the realization of the proposed superfluid helium-based experiment DELight, which will search for direct interaction of dark matter particles with masses below <o:math xmlns:o="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><o:mrow><o:mn>100</o:mn><o:mtext> </o:mtext><o:mtext> </o:mtext><o:mi>MeV</o:mi><o:mo>/</o:mo><o:msup><o:mrow><o:mi>c</o:mi></o:mrow><o:mrow><o:mn>2</o:mn></o:mrow></o:msup></o:mrow></o:math>. Published by the American Physical Society 2024
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Toschi et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: