In this work in progress paper, the communication preferences among first-year engineering students are investigated before and during the global pandemic of 2020. A 5-point Likert scale survey was developed to determine the preferred communication method of students while working on an open-ended design activity. Using this survey, 421 students pre-pandemic (Fall 2018, Spring 2019, and Fall 2019 semesters) and 26 students during the pandemic (Fall 2020 semester) were asked to evaluate the effectiveness of email, in-person meetings, phone calls, social media, text messages and video conferencing. Pre-pandemic results show that a majority of students (above 70%) considered in-person meetings and text messages to be ‘very effective’ or ‘extremely effective’ forms of communicating. Pre-pandemic results also show that approximately half of students (about 50%) considered social media and 40% of them considered video conferencing to be ‘not at all effective’ or only ‘slightly effective’ forms of communicating. Results obtained during the pandemic (Fall 2020) indicate that 79% of students sampled now consider video conferencing to be a ‘very effective’ or ‘extremely effective’ form of communicating. Results during the pandemic resemble pre-pandemic results for social media indicating that over half of the students didn’t think it was an effective form of communication. These preliminary results demonstrate our expectation that students are fundamentally changing the way they communicate during this pandemic. The intent of this study is to continue monitoring the trends during the pandemic and post-pandemic to understand how students prefer to communicate and allow us to incorporate those preferences so course content can be more effectively delivered to them. This paper also provides a description of the student population sampled and a description of the team activities.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rios et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: