Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Tuberculosis is an important public health problem among infectious diseases. The problem becomes more concerning with the emergence of MDR-TB and pre-XDR-TB. Whole genome sequencing (WGS) detection of resistance has recently gained popularity as it has advantages over other commercial techniques. We performed in-house WGS followed by detailed analysis by an in-house pipeline to identify the resistance markers. This was accompanied by Phenotypic DST, and Sanger sequencing on all the 12 XDR, 06 pre-XDR, and 06 susceptible M. tb isolates. These results were collated with online M. tb WGS pipelines (TB profiler, PhyResSE, Mykrobe predictor) for comparative analysis. Following our in-house analysis, we observed 64 non-synonymous SNPs, fifteen synonymous SNPs, and five INDELs in 25 drug resistance-associated genes/intergenic regions (IGRs) in M. tb isolates. Sensitivity for detecting XDR is 33%, 58%, 83%, and 83%, respectively, using Mykrobe predictor, PhyResSE, TB-profiler, and in-house pipeline for WGS analysis, respectively. TB-profiler detected a rare mutation H70R in the gyrA gene in one pre-XDR isolate. Lineage 2.2.1 East-Asian (Beijing sublineage type) predominated (60%) in WGS data analysis of the XDR isolates. Our findings suggest that in-house analysis of WGS data and TB-profiler sensitivity was better for the detection of second-line resistance as compared to other automated tested tools. Frequent upgradation of newer mutations associated with resistance needs to be updated, as it potentiates tailored treatment for patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Saini et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: