The selection among substitution models of molecular evolution is fundamental for obtaining accurate phylogenetic inferences. At the protein level, evolutionary analyses are traditionally based on empirical substitution models but these models make unrealistic assumptions and are being surpassed by structurally constrained substitution (SCS) models. The SCS models often consider site-dependent evolution, a process that provides realism but complicates their implementation into likelihood functions that are commonly used for substitution model selection.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ferreiro et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: