Aim: To investigate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based peritumoral texture features as prognostic indicators of survival in patients with colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM). Methods: From 2007–2015, forty-eight patients who underwent MRI within 3 months prior to initiating treatment for CRLM were identified. Clinicobiological prognostic variables were obtained from electronic medical records. Ninety-four metastatic hepatic lesions were identified on T1-weighted post-contrast images and volumetrically segmented. A total of 112 radiomic features (shape, first-order, texture) were derived from a 10 mm region surrounding each segmented tumor. A random forest model was applied, and performance was tested by receiver operating characteristic (ROC). Kaplan-Meier analysis was utilized to generate the survival curves. Results: Forty-eight patients (male:female = 23:25, age 55.3 years ± 18 years) were included in the study. The median lesion size was 25.73 mm (range 8.5–103.8 mm). Microsatellite instability was low in 40.4% (38/94) of tumors, with Ki-ras2 Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS) mutation detected in 68 out of 94 (72%) tumors. The mean survival was 35 months ± 21 months, and local disease progression was observed in 35.5% of patients. Univariate regression analysis identified 42 texture features [8 first order, 5 gray level dependence matrix (GLDM), 5 gray level run time length matrix (GLRLM), 5 gray level size zone matrix (GLSZM), 2 neighboring gray tone difference matrix (NGTDM), and 17 gray level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM)] independently associated with metastatic disease progression (P < 0.03). The random forest model achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.88. Conclusions: MRI-based peritumoral heterogeneity features may serve as predictive biomarkers for metastatic disease progression and patient survival in CRLM.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tabari et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: