Typically, an eyewitness’ verbal confidence is used to judge the reliability of their lineup identification. Across three experiments (N = 3976), we examined identifiers’ confidence in their lineup decision using their own words (n = 1099). For identification decisions, we identified 781 quantitatively unique responses representing 132 qualitatively unique statements that could be categorized into low, medium, and high confidence. For rejectors (n = 781), we identified 599 quantitatively unique responses representing 143 qualitatively unique responses that could be categorized into low, medium, and high confidence. Most participants provided a verbal phrase (e.g., pretty sure) but a significant proportion—34.19% of identifiers and 29.05% of rejectors—provided numbers (e.g., 80%). The present data highlight the variability in how confidence is expressed. The criminal justice system would benefit from guidance for interpreting verbal confidence. We provide a picture of eyewitnesses’ verbal confidence as a first step.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pennekamp et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: