For decades, gifted education equity advocates have sought to ameliorate the field’s long-standing issue of under-representation of students from historically marginalized communities. Little improvement has been realized in schools over this time (Peters, 2022). Recently, Novak (2022b) presented a GTCrit framework in a textbook primarily centered on race and directed towards gifted education practitioners and advocates; however, since critical frameworks have been largely lacking from gifted education research (Goings & Ford, 2018), and additional issues beyond race are present in the field, a broadening of Novak’s initially proposed framework may be beneficial in moving critical theories into research pertaining to gifted education. In this piece, I highlight the equity areas most relevant to the field of gifted education and build upon Novak’s (2022b) ideas to present a revised conceptual framework that could be applied to both practical settings and research about gifted education.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sarah A. Caroleo (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: