Purpose The 2014 AHA/ACS/HRS guideline for acute rate control management of atrial fibrillation with rapid ventricular response (AF with RVR) recommends IV administration of a beta-blocker or a non-dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker to decrease heart rate (HR). 1 The primary objective of this study was to determine the efficacy of > 0.25mg/kg (low dose) or <0.25mg/kg (high dose) bolus doses of diltiazem in patients who present to the emergency department (ED) with AF with RVR. Methods A retrospective cohort study of patients presenting to the ED with AF with RVR. The primary endpoint was efficacy defined as HR <100 beats per minute or conversion to sinus rhythm within 1 hour of diltiazem bolus treatment without requiring additional doses of diltiazem or other rate control agents. The main secondary endpoints were treatment failure, time to achieve HR <100 bpm, mean HR at 30 minutes and 1 hour post diltiazem administration and incidence of adverse events. Results Achievement of efficacy was observed in 12.8% compared to 20% of patients who received diltiazem IV bolus dose of <0.25mg/kg and ≥0.25mg/kg respectively (p < 0.12). Incidence of hypotension was 8.5% vs 10.4% in the <0.25mg/kg and > 0.25mg/kg groups respectively (p < 0.17). Bradycardia occurred in 3.5% vs 3.3% in the <0.25mg/kg and > 0.25mg/kg groups respectively (p < 0.29). Conclusion There were no statistically significant differences in the achievement of efficacy and incidence of adverse events in patients who received low dose or high dose IV diltiazem.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ughamadu et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: