This article uses a reading of three works by J. M. Coetzee to argue for a literature of recuperation. Much of trauma theory has debated the "unspeakableness" of trauma, and the near impossibility of a therapeutic literature. Coetzee's Disgrace, Elizabeth Costello and Slow Man present a literature which can have a therapeutic function. The article uses Aristotle's rhetoric, Hegel's dialectic, and psychoanalysis as the basis for a therapeutic literature. Hegelian dialectic and his notion of aufhebung (sublation) can be a bridge between idealist and materialist conceptions of art and its efficacy as an instrument of healing. The protagonists in both Disgrace and Slow Man must undergo the equivalent of a spiritual/psychological journey which includes this sublation, a step toward Hegel's "Nothing," in order to reach a state of "Becoming." More importantly, the texts themselves enact the same kind of journey, in which the reader, like Aristotle's audience at a tragedy, must necessarily share.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
K. A. GODDARD (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: