A probing attack on PCB signal traces poses a substantial threat, as it provides an avenue for eavesdropping on transmitted data between chips. This technique can even be exploited for a complete takeover of the victim system [1], wherein control over the entire DRAM of a server is achieved through a probing attack on the PCB traces linking the host and memory. While AES and DES can be employed to encrypt the data [2], [3], they incur added power consumption and latency [4], and always enabling data encryption could be inefficient considering the relatively low frequency of probing attacks during a system's lifespan. It is imperative to selectively activate protective measures such as AES only when an attack is in progress. Consequently, detecting probing events on PCB traces is a pivotal concern. Despite its significance, the exploration of probing-attack detection remains relatively limited. A run-time probing-attack detector based on a time-to-digital converter (TDC) is proposed in [5]. However, the minimum detectable capacitance is only 2pF, which does not cover state-of-the-art sub-pF probes and only works in a narrow temperature range. Similarly, [6] has devised an FPGA-based detector, yet it relies on metastability and could be easily unstable across process, voltage, and temperature (PVT) variations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: