Recent work in low-power backscatter modulation has enabled a new set of loT applications requiring low-to-medium throughput [1–4]. However, applications demanding medium-to-high throughput still rely on mW-level conventional wireless transceivers (TRXs). The needs of spectral-efficient high-throughput wireless communications at ultra-low-power still remain unaddressed. Pragmatic deployment of high-throughput, ultra-low-power backscattering is currently hindered by the difficulty of achieving high data rate and extreme structural simplicity at the same time: for the work in [1] (Fig. 12.4.1, upper left), by adjusting the parallel resistance formed by the I/Q transistors through programmable amplifiers (PGAs) as shown, up to 32-QAM is supported, however, gain adjustment requirement limits the max data rate to 2.5Mb/s; a digital-switch-based backscatter modulator was proposed in [2] and [3] (Fig. 12.4.1, middle left), but only QPSK is supported at max data rate of 2Mb/s; for the work in [4] (Fig. 12.4.1, lower left), higher data rate of 100Mb/s was reported, however, due to self-jammer issue caused by overlapping frequency of incident and reflected signals and the lossy power splitter, this data rate is only achievable when input power is greater than −5dBm (less than 25cm tag-to-AP distance with 23dBm EIRP), and for input power less than −30dBm (a more practical application scenario), only 0.256Mb/s was possible. Therefore, to date, practical ultra-low power backscatter IC that can achieve high-throughput with high spectral-efficiency (i.e., QAM) has not been demonstrated, exasperatingly, emerging loT applications, such as high-definition video streaming for wireless home monitor, require higher data rates than what current backscatter techniques can accommodate.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: