Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Aim.The aim of this study was to develop machine learning (ML) models to mitigate the inappropriate request of Procalcitonin (PCT) in clinical wards.Material and methodsWe built six different ML models based on both demographical data, i.e., sex and age, and laboratory parameters, i.e., cell blood count (CBC) parameters, inclusive of monocyte distribution width (MDW), and C-reactive protein (CRP). The dataset included 1667 PCT measurements of different patients. Based on a PCT cut-off of 0.50 ng/mL, we found 1090 negative (65.4%) and 577 positive (34.6%) results. We performed a 70:15:15 train:validation:test splitting based on the outcome.ResultsRandom Forest, Support Vector Machine and eXtreme Gradient Boosting showed optimal performances for predicting PCT positivity, with an area under the curve ranging from 0.88 to 0.89.ConclusionsThe ML models developed could represent a useful tool to predict PCT positivity, avoiding unusefulness PCT requests. ML models are based on laboratory tests commonly ordered together with PCT but have the great advantage to be easy to measure and low-cost.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Agnello et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: