Objective Identify associations between self-reported history of military and nonmilitary traumatic brain injury (TBI) on hearing loss and hearing difficulty from the Noise Outcomes in Servicemembers Epidemiology (NOISE) study. Study Design Cross-sectional. Setting Multi-institutional tertiary referral centers. Patients Four hundred seventy-three Active-Duty Service members (ADSM) and 502 veterans. Exposure Self-reported history of no TBI, military TBI only, nonmilitary TBI only, both military and nonmilitary TBI. Main Outcome Measures Pure-tone hearing thresholds, Speech Recognition In Noise Test (SPRINT), Hearing Handicap Inventory for Adults (HHIA), and Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ)-12. Results 25% (120/473) of ADSM and 41% (204/502) of veterans self-reported a TBI. Military TBI was associated with poorer hearing thresholds in all frequency ranges in veterans (adjusted mean difference, 1.8 dB; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.5–3.0; 3.3, 0.8–5.8; 5.1; 1.7–8.5, respectively), and in the high frequency range in ADSM (mean difference, 3.2 dB; 95% CI, 0.1–6.3). Veterans with military TBI only and nonmilitary TBI only had lower odds of correctly identifying speech in noise than veterans with no TBI (odds ratio [OR], 0.78; 95% CI, 0.72–0.83; 0.90; 0.84–0.98). ADSM with a military TBI (OR, 5.7; 95% CI, 2.6–12.5) and veterans with any TBI history (OR, 2.5; 95% CI, 1.5–4.3; OR, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.3–3.8; OR, 4.5; 95% CI, 2.1–9.8) were more likely to report hearing difficulty on HHIA. SSQ-12 results corroborated HHIA findings. Conclusions Military TBI was associated with poorer hearing thresholds in veterans and ADSM, and poorer SPRINT scores in veterans. Military TBI was associated with poorer self-perceived hearing ability in ADSM. All types of TBI were associated with poorer self-perceived hearing ability in veterans, although the strength of this association was greatest for military TBI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hughes et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: