Studies of networks for educational change often focus on elite networks or street-level bureaucrats, with little attention to staff at the middle level who arguably have immense potential to effect change. This paper theorizes educational change through mid-level bureaucrats using the case of a nonprofit organization that places its members in large public education bureaucracies. It suggests the power of networked staff to coordinate policies and reduce organizational friction, and how a strategic patchwork can accomplish these outcomes. In particular, the paper explores the role of (1) intentional placement, (2) reputational distinction, and (3) inter-cohort collaborative platforms in influencing this change. Theoretically, it furthers the study of education, state bureaucracy, and civil society by illustrating how a nonprofit can impact large government agencies through strategic mid-level networks. Practically, it illustrates organizational designs to encourage and accelerate civil service participation, an important locus for social justice and educational development.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jose Eos Trinidad (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: