Intuitive predictions about the future can expect upcoming events to conform with a pattern - representativeness heuristic - or to simply repeat the most recent and accessible outcome - availability heuristic. The present work proposes that while representativeness predictions require a relatively abstract comparison process, availability-based predictions reflect a concrete and local use of accessible information. Grounded on the construal level theory, this research pits one heuristic against the other in predictions about random events (rolling dice; coin tosses). Three studies suggest that low construal levels increase predictions consistent with the most accessible and recent outcomes while high levels of construal facilitate representativeness-consistent predictions. The findings highlight how construal level may determine reliance on one heuristic or the other.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
João Niza Braga (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: