Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Based on information from the Ministry of Justice of the Kyrgyz Republic, as well as data from scientists in a number of countries, the author concludes that it is unconstitutional and unreasonable to introduce into the criminal process of the Kyrgyz Republic such a subject as an investigating judge, who competes in his powers with the head of the investigative unit and the supervising prosecutor at the investigation stage , which creates a split in the criminal prosecution system, slows down its work, interferes with it, destabilizes it, has actually become a criminal prosecution body according to the plan of Western “experts”, whose task is to destroy the more or less efficient system of criminal prosecution and fight against crime in the Kyrgyz Republic.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
T. Imankulov (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: