Introduction: Knowledge on the prevalence and impact of a multimorbid aetiology of chronic respiratory failure (CRF) on NIV use and survival is sparse. Aims and objectives: Our aim was to describe the clinical conditions leading to home-NIV, adherence and survival, with a special focus on multimorbidity. We hypothesized that patients with multimorbid CRF have a worse prognosis than those with a single disease causing CRF. Methods: We analysed patients treated with home-NIV in Turku University Hospital between 2004-2014. The indications for NIV implementation were re-evaluated. Patients were categorized as obstructive airway disease (OAD); obesity hypoventilation syndrome (OHS); neuromuscular disease (NMD); chest wall diseases (CWD); sleep apnoea (SA); interstitial lung diseases (ILD); malignancy; other, multimorbid and acute. Patients in the acute group were set up on home-NIV during an acute illness, but later did not meet the criteria for CRF. Data on ventilator settings and NIV-use were collected. Survival of the groups was analysed. Results: 1,281 patients were included. The groups in order of magnitude were SA (26%), multimorbid (17%), OAD (16%), OHS (11%), NMD (10%), acute (8%), CWD (4%), ILD (3%), other (3%) and malignancy (2%). The most frequent combinations were OAD-SA (26%), NMD-SA (25%) and CWD-SA (11%). Mean NIV-use was 6.0 h/d (SD 4.4), median treatment duration 410 (IQR 120-1021) days and median survival 4.5 years (95% CI 3.6-5.4). Adherence, treatment duration or survival did not differ between uni- or multimorbid CRF. Conclusions: Home-NIV is used in a variety of diseases. 17% had a multimorbid origin of CRF, but it was not associated with lower adherence or survival.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fagerudd et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: