Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The article analyzes the application of Provision 83/2019 from the National Council of Justice (CNJ) and Provision 249/2013 from the Code of Norms of the General Registry Office of Justice of the Court of Justice of the State of Paraná (CNCGJ/TJPR), before the Civil Registry Offices for Natural Persons. In this sense, the objective and subjective requirements for the application of socio-affective filiation recognition in extrajudicial scope are explained. Through this, these procedures are also evaluated by the Public Prosecutor's Office and the Judiciary, especially regarding their effects on civil registration, such as name change, annotation, and other registration procedures. Methodologically, the research is classified as deductive, descriptive, and bibliographic.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Andrade et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: