Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Within agribusiness there has been a lot of debate on the topic of intensification and sustainability within agricultural practices, the current scenario of pasture livestock is seen as challenging due to the low quality of pastures and consequently low quality indices, on the other hand agricultural practices have increasingly evolved in productivity, but with criticism of environmental care. With this in mind, integration practices have a positive result that adds greater production with pasture recovery in addition to physical-chemical and microbiological improvements related to agricultural practices. The main challenge for the rancher is the off-season period, when there is low availability and quality of grass, which favors a peculiar quality of a longer cycle and greater risk, so integration practices are a strategy that was developed to overcome these challenges promoting gains in critical periods. Zootechnical indices such as higher batch rate are possible productivity and productivity gains with the practice area of nutrient cycling and soil protection are more profitable and productivity. The work brings positive results cited in the literature show the efficient use of integration practices related to peculiarities and agricultural practices.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Barboza et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: