Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The paper argues for an ideology-centred interpretation of the Orbán regime. Those regimes are considered ideology-centred that promote a particular worldview through discourse, consequential policies and the allocation of resources. In addition to demonstrating that Hungary after 2010 satisfies these criteria, I identify three principal ideological modules of the regime: illiberal conservatism, civilisationist ethnocentrism, and paternalist populism.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zsolt Enyedi (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: