Objectives: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of internet-delivered emotion regulation individual therapy for adolescents (IERITA) with nonsuicidal self-injury disorder.Design: Secondary cost-effectiveness analyses from a randomized controlled trial of IERITA plus treatment as usual (TAU) versus TAU only.Setting: Multi-site study at three child and adolescent mental health services in Sweden.Participants: Clinically referred and self-referred adolescent participants meeting diagnostic criteria for nonsuicidal self-injury disorder (N = 166) and their parents. Recruitment took place between November 20, 2017, and April 9, 2020.Interventions: Twelve weeks of IERITA delivered adjunctive to TAU versus TAU only.Main outcomes and measures: Clinical outcomes were frequency of nonsuicidal self-injury (primary outcome) and NSSI remission, assessed by the Deliberate Self-Harm Inventory-Youth version and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) estimated based on participant responses on the Kid-Screen 10. Intervention, health care sector, and societal costs were assessed using the parent-rated version of the Trimbos-iMTA questionnaire for costs associated with psychiatric illness. Clinical outcomes and costs were measured before treatment, 1-month post-treatment (primary end-point), and 3-month post-treatment.Results: Adding IERITA to TAU was associated with improved clinical outcomes and increased costs at 1-month post-treatment, reducing one NSSI episode at a cost of $2107 and achieving NSSI remission in one additional participant for $8809. At 3-month post-treatment, IERITA was more effective in clinical outcomes and cost saving from both a societal ($-2067) and health-care perspective ($-425). IERITA had a 48-55% probability of being cost-effective at common QALY willingness-to-pay thresholds at 1-month post-treatment, which increased to 73-76% at the 3-month post-treatment.Conclusions: IERITA delivered adjunctive to TAU is a cost-effective treatment of nonsuicidal self-injury in youth, compared to TAU only. At the 3-month post-treatment assessment, IERITA was associated with both improved clinical outcomes and reduced costs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bjureberg et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: