Background and Objectives The aim of this study was to investigate the compliance and treatment effects of both rapid eye movement sleep related obstructive sleep apnea (REM_ OSA) and non-stage specific OSA (NS_OSA) patients prescribed with positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy.Subjects and Method Medical records of 223 patients diagnosed with OSA from July 2021 to March 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. Six-month PAP compliance, symptoms questionnaires were compared for 60 patients in the REM_OSA group and 163 in the NS_OSA group.Results For patients in mild NS_OSA, mild REM_OSA, moderate NS_OSA, moderate REM_ OSA, severe NS_OSA, and severe REM_OSA groups, the compliance of six-month PAP was 50.0%, 33.3% (p=0.467), 69.6%, 58.3% (p>0.999), 70.7%, and 0% (p=0.023), respectively. In the NS_OSA group, PAP led to significant daytime sleepiness score improvement (7.3±3.4 to 5.7±3.6, p=0.022). In contrast, the scores for the REM_OSA group changed insignificantly (8.4±4.7 to 6.8±2.9, p=0.332).Conclusion This study revealed that PAP therapy compliance of the REM_OSA group was not lower than that of the NS_OSA group, except for the severe subgroup. However, REM_OSA was found to be less effective in improving daytime sleepiness symptoms than NS_OSA after PAP therapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jin et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: