We calculated cross sections for the dielectronic recombination (DR) satellite lines of Fe XVII and benchmarked our predictions with experimental cross sections of Fe XVII resonances that were mono-energetically excited in an electron beam ion trap. We extend the benchmark to all resolved DR and direct electron-impact excitation (DE) channels in the experimental dataset, specifically the n≥4 DR resonances of Fe XVII, complementing earlier investigations of $n=3$ channels. Our predictions overestimate by 20-25$%$ the DR and DE absolute cross sections for the higher n complexes when using the same methods as in previous works. However, we achieve agreement within ~10$%$ of the experimental results by an approach in which we "forward fold" the predicted cross sections with the spread of the electron-beam energy and the photon-energy resolution of our experiment. We then calculated rate coefficients from the experimental and theoretical cross sections, finding departures of $10-20%$ from the rates found in the OPEN-ADAS atomic database.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Grell et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: