Dear Editor, Piperazine derivative antihistamines like cetirizine and levocetirizine are commonly used anti-pruritic agents. Fixed drug eruption (FDE) is a rarely reported side effect of these drugs. Identification of causative agent becomes challenging since patients and doctors often do not suspect easily available and safe antihistamines. Here, we report three cases of FDE due to the piperazine class of antihistamines. Case 1 A 38 year old man presented with pigmented FDE on the trunk, upper arms, thighs [Figure 1] and lower lip. There had been five such episodes, the last being a year and a half back with medications for fever, cough, and sneezing. Suspected drugs included amoxicillin, paracetamol, etoricoxib, dextromethorphan and cetirizine.Figure 1: Case 1: Multiple large well-defined hyperpigmented patches on the trunk and armsCase 2 A 28 year old man developed bullous FDE over the palm [Figure 2], penile shaft and glans, after taking a drug for urticaria. There had been seven such episodes in the last 15 years associated with medications consumed for rhinitis and fever. Suspected drugs included cetirizine, levocetirizine, fexofenadine, hydroxyzine and loratadine.Figure 2: Case 2: Erythematous macule over right hand compared to the normal left palmCase 3 A 17 year old female presented with pigmented FDE on multiple sites [Figure 3] including the lips after taking medicines for recurrent sinusitis and generalized weakness. This was her fourth episode and the suspected drugs included paracetamol, multivitamins, ferrous sulfate, levocetirizine and cetirizine.Figure 3: Case 3: Dusky erythematous macules over chest, abdomen, back and thighsRecurrent episodes had led to drug phobia and patients took only alternative medicine or no treatment at all for their ailments. Oral drug provocation was done as per the institute protocol to alleviate her fear.[1] Supervised drug administration was done after taking an informed consent in a blinded manner, by starting from the least suspected drug. Drug provocation was initiated at 1/4th the routinely prescribed dose and then escalated to a full dose, if no reaction was noted. Drugs were administered every 12 hours to shorten the hospital stay. Oral challenge with cetirizine in case (1) and levocetirizine in cases (2) and (3) was positive. Patients responded favorably to topical corticosteroids and alternative class antihistamines. Oral challenge with levocetirizine after 8 weeks was negative for case (1) but cases (2) and (3) denied further provocation. Usage of the Naranjo adverse drug reaction (ADR) probability scale suggested a probable relationship for all cases.[2] Twenty one cases of FDE to piperazines have been reported till date [Table 1].[3-19] Mean age of presentation was 37.5 years (4–73 years) with male preponderance (Male:Female - 2.4:1). Clinical presentation was macular or bullous, as in our cases. Cetirizine and levocetirizine were more commonly implicated than hydroxyzine. However, cross-reactivity between antihistamines of the same class has been reported.[3-6] Cetirizine has two enantiomers, levocetirizine and dextrocetirizine, which may differ significantly in their pharmacological properties like bioavailability, metabolism, excretion, potency and selectivity for receptors and toxicity.[20] This may explain a positive challenge to cetirizine but not levocetirizine in our case. A combination of in vivo tests such as prick and intradermal skin testing, patch testing and oral challenge is generally considered the gold standard for diagnostic testing of any drug allergy. Patch testing shows positive results in up to 43% of cases. The prick test and intradermal skin test have a positivity of 23% and 67%, respectively.[21] We couldn't perform patch tests in our cases as an interval of at least 3 weeks is recommended after an episode before performing a patch test.[5]Table 1: Reported cases of fixed drug eruption to piperazine class of antihistaminesIn conclusion, we aim to highlight the importance of taking a detailed history of all medications taken by the patient and preparing a drug chart before undertaking diagnostic tests in case of an Adverse Cutaneous Drug Reaction (ADR). Declaration of patient consent The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form the patient(s) has/have given his/her/their consent for his/her/their images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patients understand that their names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed. Financial support and sponsorship Nil Conflicts of interest There are no conflicts of interest.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tyagi et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: