Current migration studies inadequately explore the staying behaviour and experiences of those in conflict or disaster-stricken regions, especially those who choose voluntary immobility. This paper introduces the ‘Resilience-Accessibility Framework’, derived from existing frameworks and a qualitative study in a conflict-affected region. This framework serves as an analytical tool for exploring the staying behaviour of individuals or community members who choose to stay put amidst adversities. Additionally, it broadens the scope of (im) mobility categories to include a wider range of migratory experiences. By introducing this framework for studying immobility, this paper enriches academic discourse and offers vital insights for policymaking.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ezenwa E. Olumba (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: