Crop health assessment is crucial for ensuring food security and sustainable agriculture practices. Stress detection and classification models have gained significant attention in recent years as a means of monitoring and managing crop health. In this review paper, we analyze the existing state of the art stress detection and classification models for crop detection, with a focus on their performance, strengths, and limitations. Our analysis covers four main areas: stress detection models, stress classification models,integrated models that combine both approaches and Crop stress severity quantification approaches. We have provided a critical evaluation of each model type, including an overview of the feature extraction techniques, algorithms, and classification methods used. We have also compared the performance metrics and benchmarks across models and discuss their potential for practical application in the agriculture industry. Our findings indicate that while significant progress has been made in the development of stress detection and classification models for crop health assessment, there are still challenges and limitations that need to be addressed. These include issues related to data acquisition and labeling, algorithm scalability and robustness, and model interpretability and explainability. We also identify opportunities for future research and development, such as the use of advanced machine learning methods, the integration of multi-modal data sources, and the development of standardized evaluation frameworks. In conclusion, our review provides a comprehensive overview of the state of the art in stress detection and classification models for crop health assessment. We identify key challenges and opportunities for future research and development and highlight the potential benefits of these models for the agriculture industry. Our findings contribute to the broader discussion on the role of AI and machine learning in agriculture and provide insights for researchers, practitioners, and policymakers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pachpor et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: