In the Fall semester of 2020, the University of Mary Hardin-Baylor's approach to educating amid the pandemic was to offer courses in the Hyflex model. In this model, students were free to choose between in-person, synchronous online, and asynchronous modes of course delivery. Moreover, students could freely switch modalities without notifying the professor. This paper presents the experience of delivering a Hyflex Statics course to second-year engineering students. This Statics course was notable because it switched from a traditional model to a flipped model midway through the semester. The reason for the switch was an observed under-performance of the class in comparison with past semesters. The effect of this switch to a flipped model is discussed in the context of student perceptions and student performance. Issues that arise when offering a flipped course within a Hyflex delivery model are also presented. A survey of student reaction to the change to a flipped model is presented, and follow-up interviews are offered as a case study. Additionally, student performance is examined in the form of exam score trends during the semester, and performance on standardized post-test that have been given in multiple preceding semesters. Finally, lessons learned from this difficult and chaotic semester are presented.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Paul Griesemer (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: