Risk assessment is a critical part of risk management for contaminated sites. However, in the specific management practice of As-contaminated sites, it is difficult to obtain realistic health risks for contaminated sites based on the total amount of pollutants and determined values of the model, thus preventing the control requirements of later remediation to be met. An increasing number of studies have recently been conducting risk assessments by considering bioavailability, modification parameters, and combined probabilistic models. To improve the accuracy of risk assessment results, taking a large As-contaminated site as a case, 432 sampling sites were set up and collected at different depths to analyze the level and distribution characteristics of As pollution, and probabilistic risk assessment was conducted with the modification of model parameters through literature research and Monte Carlo simulation. Then, the impact of traditional methods and probabilistic methods on health risk assessment was explored in comparison. The results indicated that
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yuan et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: