Background: The placement of reservoir during penile prosthesis implantation (PPI) surgery is a challenge for those patients with traumatic pelvic erectile dysfunction. Objective: This study aims to investigate a modified abdominal wall reservoir placement during PPI in Chinese patients with traumatic pelvic erectile dysfunction. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of PPI procedures performed between January 2015 and June 2023, with a specific focus on cases where the reservoirs were positioned posteriorly to the musculature of either the left or right abdominal wall. A total of 27 patients, with a mean age of 32years ( interquartile range, IQR: 24-50), and the mean duration after pelvic fracture to PPI was 84 months (IQR: 18-168),were included in this study. Fracture patterns were categorized as lateral compression (LC) (44.4%), anteroposterior compression (APC) (30%), and vertical shear (VS) (25.6%), and 70% of the patients experienced urogenital injuries Results: Following the surgery, the mean IIEF-5 scores of these patients improved significantly, rising from 5.72±0.13 to 22.15±1.26. All dimensions of the SF-36 quality of life scale demonstrated substantial improvement except for vitality. Overall satisfaction rates for both patients and their partners after PPI surgery were 91.0% and 87.5%, respectively. Notably, only two patients (7.41%) experienced postoperative pain or foreign body sensation, which resolved during follow-up. 1 prothesis was removed due to infection (3.70%), 2 prothesis was revised due to pump malfunction (7.41%). Conclusion: The placement of an abdominal wall reservoir is a straightforward and safe surgical technique that can be recommended for men with traumatic pelvic erectile dysfunction undergoing PPI surgery.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bai et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: