In the present paper we introduce a geometric generalization of standard general relativity, based on a geometry initially introduced by Friedmann and Schouten in 1924, through the notion of a semi-symmetric connection. The semi-symmetric connection is a particular connection that extends the Levi-Civita one, by allowing for the presence of torsion. While the mathematical landscape of the semi-symmetric metric connections is well-explored, their physical implications remain to be investigated. After presenting in detail the differential geometric aspects of the geometries with semi-symmetric metric connection, we formulate the Einstein field equations, which contain additional terms induced by the presence of the specific form of torsion we are studying. We consider the cosmological applications of the theory by deriving the generalized Friedmann equations in a flat, homogeneous and isotropic geometry. The Friedmann equations also include some supplementary terms as compared to their general relativistic counterparts, which can be interpreted as a geometric type dark energy. To evaluate the proposed theory, we consider two cosmological models - one with dark energy satisfying a linear equation of state, and a second one with conserved matter energy density. In both cases, we compare the predictions of the semi-symmetric metric gravitational theory with observational data for the Hubble function, and with the predictions of the standard ΛCDM model. Our findings reveal that the semi-symmetric metric cosmological models give a good description of the observational data, and for certain values of the model parameters, they can reproduce almost exactly the predictions of the ΛCDM paradigm. Consequently, Friedmann's initially proposed geometry emerges as a credible alternative to standard general relativity, in which dark energy has a purely geometric origin.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Csillag et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: