This analysis finds improved yields for Cu(I)–Rh(I) and Cu(I)–Ir(I) complexes, highlighting their catalytic applications in transfer hydrogenation.
The syntheses and structural characterization of Cu(I)–Rh(I) and Cu(I)–Ir(I) complexes are reported. These complexes are synthesized via the reaction of a previously reported copper amidinate complex, Cu 2 L 2 (L= {Ph 2 PC≡CC(NDipp) 2 }, Dipp = N , N ′‐2,6‐diisopropylphenyl), with [M(cod)Cl] 2 , (M= Rh, Ir; cod = 1,5‐cyclooctadiene) yielding complexes [{(M(cod)Cl)Ph 2 PC≡CC(NDipp) 2 } 2 Cu 2 ] (M= Rh, Ir). Additionally, an alternative one‐pot synthetic route is explored by the reaction of lithium salt of the ligand, [M(cod)Cl] 2 , (M= Rh, Ir), and CuCl, resulting in improved yields of [{(M(cod)Cl)Ph 2 PC≡CC(NDipp) 2 } 2 Cu 2 ]. Further, reaction of lithium salt of the ligand with [M(cod)Cl] 2 , (M= Rh, Ir) leads to the formation of intermediate complexes [{(M(cod)Cl)Ph 2 PC≡CC(NDipp) 2 }Li(thf) 3 ] (M= Rh, Ir), which upon hydrolysis, yielded protonated amidinate derivatives [(M(cod)Cl)Ph 2 PC≡CC(NDipp)(NHDipp)] (M= Rh, Ir). In the second pathway, lithium salt of the ligand is hydrolyzed to obtain [Ph 2 PC≡CC(NDipp)(NHDipp)] 2 and further reaction with [M(cod)Cl] 2 , (M= Rh, Ir) yields [(M(cod)Cl)Ph 2 PC≡CC(NDipp)(NHDipp)] via an alternative reaction pathway. The catalytic potential of Cu(I)–Ir(I) complex [{(Ir(cod)Cl)Ph 2 PC≡CC(NDipp) 2 } 2 Cu 2 ] is evaluated for transfer hydrogenation (TH) of aryl aldehydes using isopropanol as a hydrogen transfer source. Furthermore, the Ir complexes [{(Ir(cod)Cl)Ph 2 PC≡CC(NDipp) 2 } 2 Cu 2 ] and [(Ir(cod)Cl)Ph 2 PC≡CC(NDipp)(NHDipp] are found to be luminescent in the solid state at 77 K with an emission maximum around 580 nm.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bhatt et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: