Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Survival modeling predicts user churn risk in electric vehicle charging, suggesting retention strategies through behavioral insights.
This study proposes a survival-based modeling framework that combines behavioral features with interpretable machine learning to understand and predict user churn in electric vehicle charging services. Using a dataset of 1,074 users and 107,531 charging sessions from Central European countries, we modeled time-to-churn while handling censored observations. The best-performing model, a Stacked Weibull survival model based on gradient boosting, achieved a concordance index of 0.826 ± 0.041 and Integrated Brier Score of 0.078 ± 0.008 (5-fold cross-validation), with strong calibration relative to Kaplan-Meier survival estimates. Interpretability analyses identified sustained session frequency, positive engagement trends, and temporal regularity in charging behavior as key predictors of reduced churn risk. These findings highlight the potential of survival modeling integrated with behavioral analytics to predict churn risk and inform retention strategies in electric vehicle charging networks.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Meža et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: