This study quantifies head leakage radiation in CyberKnife systems using multiple measurement techniques, confirming compliance with IEC standards.
This study aims to measure the head leakage radiation of a CyberKnife system (Model-S7 (without MLC)) in-patient and out-of-patient planes using optically stimulated luminescence dosimeters (OSLDs), vented ionization chambers, and a pressurized ionization chamber-based survey meter, and to compare the measured leakage levels with the limits specified by the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) standards. In this study, a CyberKnife LINAC equipped with a 6 MV flattening filter-free (FFF) beam and a maximum circular field size of 6 cm in diameter was utilized. Leakage radiation was assessed for both IRIS and FIXED collimators in their fully closed positions. Three independent measurement techniques were employed to quantify leakage: optically stimulated luminescence dosimeters (OSLDs), vented ionization chambers (ICs), and a pressurized ionization chamber-based survey meter (SM). Leakage measurement points were taken as per the IEC 60601-2-1 report both for in-patient plane and out-of-patient plane. The total number of monitor units (MU) delivered were 500 MU's. The measured average in-patient plane leakage was 0.015% using IC, 0.100% using OSLD and 0.010% using SM, that is well within the tolerance limit of 0.1% according to IEC guidelines. The average leakage for out of patient plane was 0.037%, which is well within the limit of 0.5% as per IEC guidelines. The study measured head leakage radiation of the CyberKnife System using OSLD, ionization chambers, and a survey meter. Leakage levels for both in-patient and out-of-patient planes were significantly below the IEC 60601-2-1 standard limits. This confirms the system's compliance with safety guidelines, ensuring minimal radiation exposure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Singh et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: