Observational analysis shows positive effects of paradoxical leadership on athlete well-being and satisfaction, highlighting the coach-athlete relationship's role.
Few studies have regarded coaches' behaviour as two ends of a continuum in investigating their leadership. This study employed a continuum perspective, investigating the links between coaches' paradoxical leadership, athlete well-being, performance satisfaction, and the coach-athlete relationship. A total of 279 athletes (male = 150, female = 129; Mage = 20.76, SD = 1.96) who engaged in various sports participated in this study, which required participants to complete an online, multi-section questionnaire. Structural equation modelling (SEM) was employed for data analysis. The analysis indicated positive and significant paths (β ranging from .40 to .79) between paradoxical leadership and athlete well-being, performance satisfaction, as well as the coach-athlete relationship. The bootstrap approach suggested that the coach-athlete relationship explained the relationship between paradoxical leadership and athlete well-being as well as performance satisfaction (β ranging from .34 to .75; 95% CIs excluded the number zero). The results suggested that paradoxical behaviours have a significant role in supporting athletes, through which the coach could create a quality microenvironment with the athlete, contributing to both well-being and performance satisfaction. This study directly examined paradoxical leadership and its relationship with athletes' outcomes, which has significant implications for the knowledge of fluctuations in leadership.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hu et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: