Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Systematic review reveals significant benefits of somatic therapies in addiction contexts, highlighting interoceptive mechanisms.
Behavioral addictions exhibit convergent dysregulation of meso-striatal reward, cortico-limbic stress, and executive-control circuits. Top-down interventions such as CBT demonstrate moderate, often transient effects, leaving autonomic dysregulation insufficiently targeted. Somatic and body-oriented psychotherapies (SBPs) may remediate these deficits via bottom-up interoceptive and autonomic mechanisms, but quantitative synthesis is lacking. Nine randomized controlled trials (RCTs) (total N = 573) of yoga, mindfulness, or somatic interventions for gambling, gaming, or compulsive sexual behavior were systematically reviewed. Hedges' g was pooled using random-effects meta-analysis (DerSimonian-Laird, Hartung-Knapp intervals). Risk-of-bias was evaluated with RoB-2; sensitivity analyses included leave-one-out models. Pooled effect size indicated a large benefit (g = -2.62, 95% CI [-4.73, -0.51], p = .015), with heterogeneity substantial (I2 = 95.6%). Directionality persisted under sensitivity analyses. No serious adverse events were reported. This review delivers the first quantitative synthesis of SBPs in behavioral addictions, delineating robust short-term symptom reduction alongside preliminary mechanistic signals implicating interoceptive-autonomic and fronto-striatal circuits. A novel phased, biomarker-guided treatment framework is proposed, situating SBPs as adjunctive modulators within integrative addiction care. Future trials should prioritize mechanistic endpoints, longer follow-up, and dismantling designs to isolate active components.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Christopher Lomas (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: