Fluid-structure interaction reveals how pressure affects fracture resistance in CO2 pipelines, indicating improved predictive capabilities.
Fracture resistance in a rupturing pipeline is influenced by the pressure exerted on the flaps of the pipeline by the decompressing fluid. Current engineering methodologies mainly treat the fracture resistance curve and the decompression curve as uncoupled. To capture the coupled interaction, the Fluid Structure Interaction technique known as the Coupled Eulerian Lagrangian (CEL) method in Abaqus was used to model pipeline rupture. Initially, the CO2 fluid is in the dense-phase state but can exist in both a liquid and gas (2-phase) state during decompression. The Equation of State (EOS) for a CO2 mixture was calculated using the GERG-2008 EOS in REFPROP. The resultant properties were then used to describe a tabulated EOS in Abaqus for the Eulerian (fluid) domain. A user defined EOS by means of direct equations or a table lookup process were also used for description of the EOS of CO2 mixtures. Isentropic conditions were assumed. The fracture response of the pipeline in the Lagrangian (structure) domain was described using the Crack Tip Opening Angle (CTOA) criterion either directly via a user subroutine or indirectly by informing parameters of damage mechanics models in which the effective plastic strain to failure depends upon stress triaxiality and Lode angle. Full-scale shock tube simulations in the Eulerian domain were performed to validate the EOS by comparison with experimental data. The shock tube simulations were able to capture the 2-phase pressure plateau commonly reported with CO2 decompression. CEL simulations of a pipeline buried in soil were compared to full-scale CO2 pipeline rupture data available in literature. The predictions agreed well with the experimental data, with a predicted crack velocity of about 100 m/s. The pressure profile predicted for CO2 will be discussed. The influence of shock waves will be addressed, as well as comparing CTOA versus fracture speed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Williams et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: