Retrospective study reports high clinical remission in patients with eosinophilic esophagitis, indicating oral-budesonide therapy is viable.
Background: Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic, progressive, immune-mediated disease of the esophagus. Esophageal dysfunction in solid food dysphagia combined with eosinophil-dominant inflammation (⩾15 eos/high-power-field (hpf)) serves as diagnostic criteria. Treatment objectives for active EoE include induction and maintenance of clinical-histological remission. Topical budesonide therapy in the form of an orodispersible tablet (BUD-ODT) has shown effectiveness in both scenarios. Objectives: To examine the efficacy and safety of BUD-ODT therapy in adults with active EoE in a Real-World-Setting. Design: This retrospective study from two German EoE centers examined the efficacy and safety of BUD-ODT therapy in adults with active EoE between June 2018 and August 2022. Methods: Patient demographics, clinical characteristics, and EoE history were extracted from medical records. Evaluations included clinical (Straumann Dysphagia Index, range: 0–9, remission: ⩽3 points), histological (remission: ⩽15 eos/hpf), and endoscopic assessment (endoscopic reference scoring system (EREFS) score, range: 0–9, remission: ⩽2 points). Three periods were analyzed: Induction phase (induction therapy (IT): 1 mg BID, 6–12 weeks; n = 201), maintenance phase I (RM1: 0.5 mg BID or 1 mg QD, 14–24 weeks; n = 109), and maintenance phase II (RM2: same dosage as RM1, 52–104 weeks; n = 72). Results: A total of 221 adults with clinical-histologically proven active EoE were included. Clinical-histological remission was achieved in 75.1% (151/201) of patients after IT, maintained in 73.4% (80/109) after RM1, and in 76.4% (55/72) after RM2. The relapse rate was 26.6% (29/109) after RM1 and 23.6% (17/72) after RM2. Those patients underwent re-induction therapy for 6–8 weeks and were re-evaluated separately (remission: 36.0% after RM1 and 46.2% after RM2). Endoscopic remission was demonstrated in 88.1% (177/201) after IT. The most prevalent side effect was endoscopically detected combined oral-esophageal candidiasis. Conclusion: BUD-ODT demonstrated high effectiveness in inducing and maintaining remission in a real-world setting. The spectrum of side effects did not reveal any new aspects compared to known clinical data.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Weisfeld et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: