Comparative analysis reveals that rear emitter configurations improve efficiency and voltage in p-TOPCon solar cells, suggesting design pathways for industry.
This study investigates the performance optimization of p‐type tunnel oxide passivated contact (p‐TOPCon) solar cells through comparative analysis of front and rear emitter configurations. The objective is to address efficiency limitations by identifying which architecture offers superior electrical performance, thereby informing optimal design strategies for industrial applications. Numerical simulations are conducted using the Quokka3 tool to evaluate the impact of emitter placement, wafer resistivity, bulk carrier lifetime, and contact selectivity under identical conditions. Results indicate that the rear emitter configuration delivers better passivation and a higher open‐circuit voltage ( V oc = 715 mV), achieving a peak efficiency of 24.21%, while the front emitter design demonstrates advantages in light absorption and fabrication simplicity. Future work will extend the analysis to include n‐type polycrystalline silicon contacts and explore manufacturable pathways to further increase efficiency in commercial p‐TOPCon cells.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Khokhar et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: